Find Or Construct A Graph Of The Us Deficit For The Last 100 Years. Including

Find or construct a graph of the US deficit for the last 100 years
Including the graph you found or constructed, prepare a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding title and reference slides) on the U
S
deficit
You can explore the history of the deficit, the growth, how it is calculated, what contributes to it, if it is necessary, etc
After researching the deficit, write a conclusion on the current state of our deficit and how it impacts our government spending and the overall economy
  With a turn-it-in report less than 5 percent of plagiarism Presentation Rubric 40 to >34 pts Exemplary The presentation clearly addresses all aspects of the directions
The ideas contained in it are clear, based in solid logic, and concise at all times
The work provides multiple textual examples and details that clearly support the ideas presented within it
The topic is thoroughly explored in detail
34 to >20 pts Meets Expectations The presentation addresses all aspects of the assignment directions
The ideas contained in it are usually clear, based in logic, and concise
The work provides some textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it
The topic is explored with sufficient detail
20 to >10 pts Developing The presentation addresses most aspects of the assignment directions
The ideas contained in it are general, lack solid logic and/or wordy
The work provides few textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it
The topic is explored at a general level
10 to >0 pts Not Acceptable The presentation does not address any aspect of the assignment directions
It contains limited to no idea and lacks solid logic foundation
The work provides no textual examples or details to support the ideas presented
OR No presentation submitted or submitted late
OR The presentation contains plagiarized content
/ 40 pts Discussion/Evaluation view longer description 40 to >34 pts Exemplary The discussion very effectively summarizes the main points and wraps up the presentation
Highly rational arguments or evaluations are skillfully used to persuade audiences and to substantiate logical points
All information presented is accurate
34 to >20 pts Meets Expectations The discussion summarizes the main points and wraps up the presentation
Rational arguments or evaluations are used to persuade audiences and to substantiate points
Most information presented is accurate
20 to >10 pts Developing The discussion is somewhat weak, but makes an attempt to summarize the main points and wrap up the project
Only ordinary arguments or evaluations are used to substantiate points
Some information is clearly not accurate
10 to >0 pts Not Acceptable The discussion is very weak with no attempt made to provide main points in the project
Limited to no arguments or evaluations are used
Most information is inaccurate
OR No presentation submitted or submitted late
OR The presentation contains plagiarized content
/ 40 pts Quality of Sources, References and Citations view longer description 40 to >34 pts Exemplary Relevant scholarly sources used
Made a clear connection between the research and the assignment
Documented correctly per APA style
Citations are included where necessary
34 to >20 pts Meets Expectations Scholarly sources used
Sources are generally strong
All citations and references are included though there may be minor errors in the use and formatting of citations
APA is used with minor violations
20 to >10 pts Developing Sources are mostly strong, but are lacking in variety or timeliness
Many cited sources present have quite a few formatting errors
Format of document reflects incomplete knowledge of standard
10 to >0 pts Not Acceptable No sources used or sources are not representative of research
APA style is not supported
Format is not recognizable
OR No presentation submitted or submitted late
OR The presentation contains plagiarized content
/ 40 pts Presentation view longer description 15 to >11 pts Exemplary Presentation meets the minimum number of slides required
Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide
Presentation shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection and depth
11 to >7 pts Meets Expectations Presentation meets the minimum number of slides required
Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide
Presentation demonstrates adequate reflection
7 to >3 pts Developing Presentation does not the minimum number of slides required by 1 slide
Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide
Presentation demonstrates limited reflection
3 to >0 pts Not Acceptable Presentation does not the minimum number of slides required
Presentation fails to address the selected topic
It manifests no evidence of reflection
Major revision needed
OR No presentation submitted or submitted late
OR The presentation contains plagiarized content
/ 15 pts Technical Quality view longer description 15 to >11 pts Exemplary There are no errors in formatting
Grammar, spelling and punctuation are impeccable